| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
marketjacker wrote: My God you and dirk (and most of IBS) are so bitter you are getting kicked from rakapas. My God gets kicked from nowhere.
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.15 00:51:00
|
42. Please post if your corp is going to join FW. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Death Toll007 wrote: Contemplating placing an alt in FW for a bit, but would have no idea who to join. Any thoughts? -DT Gallente or Minmatar to leach off of plex caps.
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.14 23:15:00
|
43. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: 2.) The doomsday predictions will come true, and the war will stagnate, fights will decrease, and I will have demonstrated to CCP that they should have listened to me and pared back the multiplier and not gone with ful...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.14 21:45:00
|
44. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lock out wrote: Not only that, but it's a lose lose situation. We win, we have no targets left in lowsec. We lose, we get locked out of stn. IF it's a balance, lots of hours of spinning around a boring button. And once in a blue moon when star...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.14 19:33:00
|
45. Market PVP: Rens vs Dodixie - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Andy DelGardo wrote: [quote=Zet Morg] I'm not really a trader, i'm mainly "forced" into this stupid 0.01isk game as a producer/seller. I really think they should review real world market trading, compared to this stupid 0.01isk grind "minigame"...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.12 23:16:00
|
46. New Lowsec Systems! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Looks like our side won the coin toss and the one corp for faction peacefare will be "Caldari Defense Union". I'm guessing the build they are using to develop FW isn't a mirror of TQ.
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 20:42:00
|
47. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: IGÇÖm sorry, but I completely disagree on handing a losing faction safe missioning. You seem to have missed one of the communityGÇÖs major gripes about the Faction Warfare system, that mission farming (at least until t...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 16:25:00
|
48. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Otherwise, weGÇÖd see pilots enlist in the losing faction just to continue farming for the items that are lucrative on the market, avoiding pew pew just like happens today. This way, if someone looking at the markets d...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 16:21:00
|
49. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The thing that many players are struggling with is that they want to see specific mechanics that directly incentivize losing, thus giving them reason to want to stick around and fight from behind. CCP would much pref...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 15:43:00
|
50. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: LOL!! My comment had nothing to do with the Gallente or Caldari specifically, I'm just saying that the very notion of a winning faction renting mission hub systems back to the loser for mission purposes is the kind of ...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 15:36:00
|
51. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vyktor Abyss wrote: 6. Please consider adding Mindlink Implants to FW LP stores. This would fit in quite well racially (even though being Gallente we'd get the crappiest one ). Potentially you could get Outer Ring Excavation loosely in on FW...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 11:33:00
|
52. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Axl Borlara wrote: Also, the more systems a faction controls, the more spread out the defenders will be (even if there are more). So taking systems back should be that bit easier. You know how they are making DUST 514 "Eve-like" by having w...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 11:21:00
|
53. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edward Olmops wrote: The game was an utter failure, because the endgame entirely relied on something like Factional Warfare. Basic problem: in a conflict with 2 sides, one side will get an advantage at some point and this could be simply a bi...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.10 11:09:00
|
54. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Cearain wrote: The losing side would get effectively 1/16 the lp for a pvp kill with respect to the shared items. I'm glad I'm on the winning side. We will gladly accept your surrender and will take you into our militi...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 23:16:00
|
55. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Haifisch Zahne wrote: It seems to me a piece of the puzzle that is missing is how Rank fits in: rank should narrow what may be purchased in the LP store. One cannot simply switch sides, just to cash in when another side is winning. It would als...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 19:08:00
|
56. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Ahazu Sagam wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The long-awaited Dev Blog is up!! http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=28659 I know it, CCP is trolling us. And the most important question's are still not answered: ...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 18:42:00
|
57. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Amadeus3 wrote: "Please note such LP is split for all eligible members that meet all capture criteria; as such, 2 Amarr enlisted pilots capturing a Minor site would only receive 5,000 LPs each." Wont this create a load of 'leech' alts that jum...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 18:36:00
|
58. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gogela wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: I must be missing what the driver for conflict is? It seemed like rewarding the winning side so heavily simply ensures that the best profit will be had by having everyone join the same faction... what am I mi...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 18:27:00
|
59. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kusum Fawn wrote: Is there any benefit for fighting in a heavily upgraded system as opposed to a lightly upgraded system? better rewards for trying to take a Dominated system as opposed to newly conquered one? or are all payouts the same? Th...
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 18:24:00
|
60. Sticky:New dev blog: Factional Warfare overhaul - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
BlindFury wrote: I can't remember if this already happens or not, but why not put datacores as a reward in hacking and analyzing deadspace sites along with the other changes listed? BF They already are.
- by Dirk Smacker - at 2012.05.09 18:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |